This isn't only a tasteful inquiry (however that is surely monk 5e part of it). It's likewise a mechanical inquiry. For instance, say you have a priest who is renowned for his capacity to accomplish more harm with a solitary punch than most warriors could do with two hands and a mace. Indeed, you'll presumably need to put resources into accomplishments like Power Attack and Vital Strike, so as to pool your harm dice into a solitary shot. Then again, on the off chance that you are an unfeeling, severe brawler, at that point you should utilize the Boar Style fighter 5e accomplishments (a battling style concocted by orcs) as an approach to grandstand the tearing and tearing capacities of your priest's savage style.
When discussing how you battle, it is critical that the details on your sheet coordinate the depiction in your head.The first thing most players think about priests is they are unarmored warriors who battle with their unarmed hits as frequently likewise with weapons. The second thing most players think about the class is it has a legitimate arrangement prerequisite. In any case, it's imperative to recollect that while being legal infers you have certain attributes (general acquiescence to power, regard for custom, genuineness, keeping one's assertion), it is essential to take note of that there is profundity and condition to how a character perspectives such things without breaking this prerequisite.
For instance, take Harak Chainbreaker. This half-orc was brought up in the severe slaughtering pits of the field, until he in the long run turned into a boss, and organized an upheaval, breaking himself and his kindred field warriors out of subjection. Presently, Harak choosing to violate the law of the dnd character creator country by viciously liberating himself from servitude, alongside numerous different slaves, doesn't mean he is certainly not a legal person. For whatever length of time that he has an expressed code and theory, and there is a reasonable rationale with respect to what laws he feels concern him and what laws don't, you may contend that his arrangement aasimar is completely unblemished — particularly in the event that he is legal acceptable, and he naturally felt that creation subjugated, conscious creatures kill each other for sport was not a law he believed he ought to comply.
This will require plunking down with your DM to work out the subtleties dnd 5e backgrounds of your character, and in what ways they mirror the various components of what is viewed as legal, and how those reflections play into their own way of thinking of battle as a priest. For instance, Daeran of The Splintered Hand is dutiful to what he thinks about real position. While that implies he will follow the desire of his lords in the Order, and those of his leader in the Temple Legion, he may feel no specific prerequisite to comply with the orders of a self important civilian army sergeant in a backwater town he's only going through, especially when he presumes that sergeant's power is gotten not from his position, yet from the way that he has twenty-five harasser young men who will endeavor to club any individual who doesn't do what he says.
Legal characters have unquestionably more squirm room than most players might suspect, so don't let the arrangement necessity smother what your priest can be.